Skip to main content
    For student-athletes

    Know what you're signing.

    You're a junior at a D1 school. A regional energy-drink brand DMs you on Instagram. Two days later you have a four-page PDF in your inbox. The brand rep is friendly, the dollar amount looks decent, and they want you to sign by Friday so the campaign can launch ahead of the season opener.

    Buried on page three is a clause that quietly assigns your name and likeness to the brand for use "in any media, in any territory, in perpetuity." Page four lists three required social posts per month — but the morality clause defines "conduct injurious to the brand" so broadly that getting cited for a noise complaint at a friend's apartment could cost you the deal.

    You have until Friday. Your agent isn't on retainer yet. Your compliance officer is at a Title IX training all week. What do you do?

    You upload the PDF to RevU. Sixty seconds later you have a plain-English breakdown of every risky clause, a benchmark comparison against contracts with similar reach and sport, and 3 specific redline suggestions you can send back to the brand.

    Free previews on every contract. One full review free to start. $15 per full review after. No card required.

    Five risk patterns we see in athlete contracts every week

    These aren't hypotheticals. These are patterns RevU has flagged across hundreds of NIL deals in 2024–2026 — and most athletes don't notice them until it's too late.

    1
    Exclusivity creep
    What it looks like

    The contract says "exclusive in the energy-drink category." Fine, you think — you don't have other energy-drink deals. But the definition of "energy drink" in §1.3 covers "any beverage marketed for performance, recovery, or wellness, including hydration powders, electrolyte mixes, and pre-workout supplements." You just locked yourself out of every Liquid I.V., Gatorade, and protein-brand deal for 18 months.

    How RevU helps

    RevU flags the breadth of the category definition and proposes a redline that scopes exclusivity to a specific NAICS code or a named list of competitors. Read more on the exclusivity clause glossary entry.

    2
    Morality severity disparity
    What it looks like

    The brand reserves the right to terminate "in the event of any conduct, public statement, or association that the brand, in its sole discretion, deems detrimental to the brand's image." That's an M5 on RevU's morality severity ladder — sole-discretion termination with no notice, no cure period, and no payback. The brand's reciprocal obligation is M0: nothing. If the brand's CEO gets indicted next month, you don't get to walk.

    How RevU helps

    RevU grades every morality clause on a five-tier severity scale and flags one-sided language. The redline we propose: mutual termination rights, a 10-day cure period, and a "convicted of a felony" trigger instead of "sole discretion." See the morality clause glossary entry for the full ladder.

    3
    Per-post under-pricing
    What it looks like

    The deal: $1,200 for 6 Instagram posts plus 12 stories over 90 days. Math: $200 per post. RevU compares that against benchmarks in our analyzed-contract dataset for athletes with comparable follower counts (50–150K) in your sport and sees that median per-post compensation is $450–$600. You're getting 35% of fair market value — and signing a 90-day exclusivity that locks out any better offer.

    How RevU helps

    RevU's compensation breakdown shows the per-post/per-story rate, the total guaranteed value, and a percentile band against benchmark data. Glossary: per-post compensation.

    4
    NCAA NIL Go disclosure trap
    What it looks like

    Your school requires NIL deals over $600 to be disclosed through NCAA NIL Go within 30 days of signing. The contract you're about to sign is for $5,000 — but §7.2 says "the parties shall keep the terms of this agreement strictly confidential and shall not disclose to any third party without the prior written consent of the brand." If you disclose to NIL Go, you breach the contract. If you don't disclose to NIL Go, you risk your eligibility. The brand bears none of this risk — only you do.

    How RevU helps

    RevU detects confidentiality clauses that conflict with NCAA / state / school disclosure obligations and proposes a carve-out: "except as required by applicable NCAA rules, state law, or institutional policy." See NIL Go and disclosure requirement.

    5
    Perpetual image-rights grant
    What it looks like

    §4.1 grants the brand the right to use your name, image, and likeness "in any medium now known or hereafter devised, in any territory, in perpetuity." The deal pays you for one campaign quarter. The brand can run your face in subway ads, TikTok ads, and stadium signage for the next 30 years for no additional compensation. You also can't license your likeness to a competitor without breaching the survival clause.

    How RevU helps

    RevU flags perpetuity language and proposes a redline that scopes the license to the campaign window (e.g., 90 days from launch) with a named "permitted use" list. See perpetuity and right of publicity.

    How does RevU actually do this?

    RevU classifies every contract against the CUAD 41-class taxonomy, scores each clause on athlete-vs-brand friendliness, and benchmarks compensation against a growing corpus of analyzed NIL deals. We don't hand-wave it — read the full methodology.

    Curious how state law shapes your NIL options? California, Florida, and Texas have meaningful differences. Wondering whether to use RevU vs. paying for full attorney review on every deal? See RevU vs. manual review.

    Questions athletes ask before they sign

    Will RevU replace my agent or my attorney?

    No. RevU is a contract-review tool, not a law firm. We don't give legal advice and we don't sign anything on your behalf. We surface the risks so that when you do bring your agent or attorney into the conversation, you've already done the first 80% of the analysis yourself — and you know what specific clauses to ask them about. For high-stakes deals ($25,000+ or multi-year), we still recommend a licensed attorney review.

    What if I've already signed the contract?

    RevU is still useful. Most contracts have a renegotiation window, a renewal date, or a termination provision you can leverage. Even if the term is fixed, knowing where the risks are means you can avoid triggering them — and you'll be much better prepared when the renewal conversation comes.

    How does RevU handle NCAA NIL Go disclosure?

    RevU flags clauses that conflict with NIL Go's 30-day disclosure requirement for deals over $600, including confidentiality language and indirect-disclosure prohibitions. We can also generate a NIL Go-ready summary of the deal terms (compensation, deliverables, term length) so you don't have to translate the legalese yourself when you file.

    Is my contract data private?

    Yes. Contracts are stored encrypted at rest, scoped per-user, and never used to train any third-party model. We don't sell or share your contract data with anyone — not brands, not agencies, not other athletes. Read the full security and privacy details.

    How much does this cost?

    Free previews always. One full review free to start, then $15 per full review. No subscription, no commitment. Buy credits in packs of 1, 5, or 10. If you're getting more than ten deals a year, the math is still trivial compared to a single hour of attorney time. See full pricing.

    Your contract is waiting on your desk.

    Sixty seconds with RevU before you sign costs nothing. Signing without it could cost you years of your likeness, a six-figure renegotiation, or your NCAA eligibility. The clauses that bite are the ones nobody read closely until the brand tries to enforce them — and by then, the leverage is gone.

    You don't need a law degree to understand what you're signing. You need sixty seconds and a tool that reads the four-page PDF for you. That's it.

    Already signed something you're worried about? Upload it anyway — knowing what's in the contract is the first step to deciding whether to push for a renegotiation or wait for the renewal window.