Skip to main content
    Back to glossary

    Non-Compete Clause

    Reviewed 2026-05-17
    [Reviewed by Darren Heitner OR contracted attorney TBD]

    In plain English

    A non-compete bars you from working with competing brands — usually for a defined time after the deal ends.

    Full definition

    A non-compete clause prohibits the athlete from working with competing brands for a defined period — typically during the contract term plus a "tail" period of weeks or months after termination. Non-competes overlap with exclusivity clauses, but the focus is post-termination restriction rather than in-term restriction. Enforceability varies dramatically by state: California broadly refuses to enforce non-competes against individuals; the FTC has signaled enforcement-policy hostility toward non-competes generally; many other states enforce reasonable, narrowly-tailored non-competes. Athletes should push hard for a tail period of zero or near-zero (30 days at most), a narrow product / category scope, geographic limits, and a carve-out for deals signed before the contract effective date. A multi-year post-termination non-compete in a low-fee NIL deal is rarely enforceable but can still chill new deals.

    What it looks like in a contract

    For a period of six (6) months following the expiration or termination of this Agreement, Athlete shall not enter into any endorsement, sponsorship, or promotional agreement with any of the entities listed on Schedule B (Direct Competitors).

    Synthesised from common contract patterns. Not lifted from any specific real contract.

    How RevU helps

    RevU's NIL contract analyzer detects non-compete clause provisions automatically — flagging the exact triggering language, scoring athlete-vs-brand friendliness, and surfacing negotiation leverage where it exists. See How RevU flags overbroad non-competes for the full product context.

    Check your contract free